31 August 2012

the goddamn dumbest kickstarter


In the year 2012, most of us have seen a lot of goddamn dumb Kickstarter projects. But Seed Money: Coins You Can Plant has got to be the goddamn dumbest, and that includes the most traditionally objectionable Kickstarter category, obnoxious film projects.




Ugh, where to start. Let's set aside the fact that this idea is not really viable at all in terms of growing plants. It’s probably not the greatest idea to “secretly tuck them into medians, public parks, or your friend’s front yard,” per the suggestions. Public parks are actually ecosystems, for one thing, and for another maybe your friend doesn’t want to have to mow your pretentious Kickstarter carrots.

Of course, I realize it’s ridiculous to evaluate any Kickstarter project in terms of its practicality. So let’s consider the other suggestions for what to do with seed money. I particularly like imagining someone “leav[ing] a few with [their] tip at a restaurant” or “playfully trying to use them at [their] local coffee shop or bakery.” I would really like to see someone hand their seed money to someone in the retail or service industries. “What do you mean this is dumb? That letterpress was handmade by the good folks at Porridge Papers!” “The imagery is hand-lettered, you capitalist pig!”

In the final analysis, the dumbest thing about the Seed Money Kickstarter campaign is the mirror it holds up to all of our big dumb-dumb faces, because it raised almost $47,000.

$47,000!!!!

Take your $47,000 and run, Leafcutter Designs. A grift is the only way to redeem this project, for you and for us.

27 August 2012

on the shameful shit I eat


Sometimes I marvel at all the normal stuff that other people eat. I will know I have finally mastered adulthood the day I wake up functional enough to make eggs or something. Instead I just sit around chugging Diet Coke like an animal. 

Part of the problem is I can’t think of anything. I go in the grocery store and just wander around staring at all the food like an alien. What do people eat? I wish I knew. The terrible thing is I’m at the store all the time, pretty much once a day, because I’m always out of cereal or Diet Coke.

Lunch is a wildcard. Sometimes I’ll go double cereal, but that’s deeply unsatisfying. Sometimes I just skip it and eat dinner at 5:00 like an octogenarian, which inevitably leads to a second dinner situation—the worst of all possible worlds! Sometimes I’ll eat popcorn or stuffed olives or peanut butter crackers. Lately I’ve taken to pairing everything with grapefruit, which seems so civilized. It’s like the last vestige of my humanity, these grapefruits.

The weird thing is that I’m actually very interested in food. I read food blogs and subscribe to food magazines. I love farmers’ markets and complicated recipes and even manage to make something delicious once in a while. Usually that’s when I’m having someone over for dinner. If I were keeping things real, I’d just serve Diet Coke, spicy pickles, and a granola bar. Ha! I just made myself hungry.

For dinner, more often than not I will have one thing. We’re not talking like one-pot wonders like thick nourishing stews or big beautiful salads. My mom often calls around the time I’m making dinner and asks what I’m having. “Kale,” I’ll say. “Oh yum. What are you having with it?” “Uh, just the kale.”

I once read an interview with David Lynch where he talked about how he eats the same thing for dinner every night. It was like green peas and a milkshake or something like that. It reminded me of me, which made me really proud, until I realized: whoa. If you’re looking at your day-to-day life and things are coming up Lynch, well, it might be time to regroup.

18 August 2012

the b-side


May 14
12:37 p            Chris Ware—the only cartoonist in my article whose work I knew and loved before I set about writing it—becomes the first person to respond to (and reject) my request for an interview. “Dear Mr./Ms. O,” his email begins. I am not available for an interview because your project is fucking stupid. (paraphrase)

May 22
8:34 a              Look, I have another email from Chris Ware! Maybe he has changed his mind!!!! Wait, no, he’s just…sending the same rejection email a second time. 

May 24
12:04 p            My fourth (but not final) attempt to contact Lynda Barry is to email a far-flung friend of the family who I learned, through an inspired bit of detective work, is her known associate. Worry about the fine line between magical thinking and schizophrenia.

May 25
10:00 a            My long interview with Phoebe Gloeckner begins with what I believe to be a well considered question that will show her I totally get it. “I don't know,” she says. “I would ask YOU that. Do you know? What's your idea?” Oh god.

May 31
5:00 p              Residually nervous from my interview with Alison Bechdel, I go home and accidentally get hospital drunk. 

June 15
5:25 p              Hang up from a call with Craig Thompson, who should win a Good Citizenship Award for being the most polite person in his industry. His mama raised him right! Uhh, except for that whole evangelical Christian thing.
June 26
10:00 a            After more than a dozen emails with her assistant, I am finally on the phone with Aline Kominsky Crumb. Who is the petulant child singing off-key and playing his harmonica in the background? Oh, that’s Robert Crumb.

June 26
2:44 p              Receive email from Stephin Merritt and stare at it like a creep for the rest of the afternoon.

August 13
2:54 p              The night before publication, my editor requests that I add a few paragraphs to the end of my Dave Eggers stuff to account for the Zeitoun brouhaha. I’ve never read Zeitoun. Uh oh!

August 13
3:30 p              Wrap up a series of emails with editor re: a new title for the piece. Every title I think of sounds like a dissertation title or a dorky band name.

August 14
10:12 a            King of The Awl Choire Sicha doesn’t like the new title. He’s working on a new one, which will hopefully involve cats.

August 14
10:37 to
12:16p             New title options are on the table, including a version of the one we ended up using. Fraught email exchange involving dozens of iterations of the Penis Ray-title ensues. I’m worried it’s…tabloid-y? “I’m from the South,” I confess at one point. “A peen-title sort of freaks me out!” 

August 14
12:17 p            Realize that having a tabloid-y title is  probably the whole point and start thinking it’s maybe acutally sort of cool. Repress deep concern re: mother’s inevitable horror.

August 14
6:25 p              As though responding to a conversation he couldn’t possibly have heard between me and my friend D regarding the obnoxiousness of his column, Awl Weather Boy Tom Scocca leaves a weirdly hostile comment telling me to put a sock in it. Looks like I just got another nemesis!

August 16           
7:30 p              Read extensive critique from armchair editor JM-C, who comments that my piece “makes [his] eyes glaze over a bit” and that he “think[s] he knows why this wasn’t purchased” by a print mag. Resolve to never, ever look at the comments section again because I am seriously the worst sport ever and now I want to cut a bitch. 

August 16
7:31 p              Immediately break resolve by spending 45 mins. vanity googling to research the article’s Internet footprint, which I’m thrilled to discover is actually quite decent. Then find some guy’s blog whose takeaway from the piece was that graphic novels should be fact-checked—a practice that he whole-heartedly endorses. Wait, what?

August 16
8:16 p              Lie on couch and worry about America.

August 17
4:00 p              Realize that I unconsciously believed that, once I released a Real Act of Writing into the world, an angel of mercy would descend upon my home office and tell me it’s time to begin my rightful life. Am I shocked by my own naïveté? Or because it hasn't happened?

09 August 2012

friends without benefits


It seems like a shame—and possibly a personal failure—that, at the age of 34, I don’t have any experience with “staying friends.”

I know it’s not entirely my fault. I came of age during a weird cultural moment for intimacy. The Internet, Dan Savage, and Days of Our Lives have pretty much equally shaped my thinking on relationships. I believe that the human heart, like the ocean, is a beautiful, strange, and dangerous landscape governed by flux, predation, and mystical vibrations. I believe that monogamy is, at best, problematic and statistically uncertain. I believe that your true love can turn into a person possessed by the devil in the time it takes to watch three commercials.

In this milieu, it seems like some of the happiest couples I know are the ones who are no longer together, people who found a way to evolve their relationships after the romance part went south. Given that half of marriages end in divorce, this chameleon-like ability to adapt seems like cultural necessity, and maybe even biological imperative.

Kate Bolick, a journalist who has become my cohort’s unofficial PR rep, described this brave new world really well in All the Single Ladies,” her high-profile essay about unmarried women that ran in The Atlantic last year. “One of the many ways in which our lives differed from our mothers’ was in the variety of our interactions with the opposite sex,” she wrote.

“Men were our classmates and colleagues, our bosses and professors, as well as, in time, our students and employees and subordinates—an entire universe of prospective friends, boyfriends, friends with benefits, and even ex-boyfriends-turned-friends. In this brave new world, boundaries were fluid, and roles constantly changing.”

I had intensely mixed feelings about that piece as a whole. At one point, I actually started a list of all the things about it that bothered me, but then I was like, you know what? My blog isn’t college. (A few months later, I would go through exactly the same process with Lena Dunham’s Girls.) Suffice it to say I find it depressing that someone had to write a 10,000-odd word essay explaining why it’s okay for ladies to not get married. Like, we are at least ten steps behind where we need to be as a society if the editors at The Atlantic think that is in any way appropriate, much less progressive.

(Is it me or is The Atlantic sort of a tabloid? Has it always been that?)
  
Putting aside for the moment the article’s weirdly outdated Sex and the City-esque graphics, Bolick’s closing image—the “iconic medieval bastion of single-sex living” where Ellen, an ex-pat with “smiling red-painted lips,” has a tiny apartment—struck me as vaguely sinister. Surely there is another “place where single women can live and thrive as themselves” that doesn’t have single beds and a policy against gentleman callers? Gah.

At the same time, other parts of the article really resonated with me. I especially appreciated the more personal sections of Bolick’s story, which were far more interesting to me than the other case studies and her (really rather iffy) anthropological argument.

For instance, I was moved by her account of shopping with her ex-boyfriend for his wedding suit. To me it perfectly captured how former lovers can (should?) flit in and out of one another’s lives in increasingly complex contexts and configurations, merrily co-existing like characters in an upbeat soap opera.

My own love life has been much more dramatic and bleak, more like a telenovela, if telenovelas were written by Cormac McCarthy. Every guy I’ve ever loved has become, in the fullness of time, a stranger staring up at me from a pile of old photos like a missing person’s face on the back of a milk carton. One day they’re just gone.

Kate Bolick, on the other hand. Somehow her suit-shopping anecdote struck me as the pinnacle of serenity. Her appropriate, rational, healthy behavior made me feel all too aware of my own tendency towards total romantic apocalypse.


In particular, the photo of the author calmly sipping a glass of champagne seemed to me a grotesque parody of the Mezcal-fueled blowout fight I had recently had with D, a good friend and longtime Person of Interest in the ash-covered hellscape that is my romantic life.

(via)

It’s ironic, really, that my friendship with D was built on the back of a one-night stand. We were freelancers working on a long in-house project who ended up going home together after another colleague’s karaoke birthday night. (I don’t even know what to say. Some days I think I’m pretty cool and then other days it’s like I’m living in an Everybody Loves Raymond plot.) When one night became two, I told D that I thought we should pursue it. He said no thanks, so we found ourselves in the awkward position of continuing to share a workspace. Our first day back he walked into my cubicle and, without saying a word, sat on my desk and handed me half of his peanut butter cookie.

It was a simple gesture, but it was exactly right. It opened a door in our nascent friendship, which I had been prepared to write off for the sake of convenience. We became closer after the project ended. We emailed a lot. We went to concerts. We went to movies and dinners and drinks. We stayed out really late. Increasingly, we made out in bars and on street corners while we waited for taxis. (Kind of gross, I know. Sorry, mom.) Then finally, one night, we started going home in the same taxi.

A self-proclaimed paragon of modern values, I tried not to worry too much about labels. I was so tired of overthinking, so ready to embark upon a new era of my life in which I would be super cool instead of perpetually worried and weird. I was careless under the pretense of feeling hopeful, drinking too many Manhattans and artisanal beers to dull the clanging alarm bells that I willfully wrote off as neuroticism. The old me.

For a while that worked pretty well. And as much as I liked sharing taxis, that was almost secondary to the friendship, which I treasured. D’s the rare sort of person who makes you feel like the best possible version of yourself. I liked going to shows and tapping his shoulder to tell him about the songs with lyrics that, as a teenager, I printed on notebook paper and taped to my bedroom wall. I liked crafting witty emails that poked fun at his absurd acting classes. I liked watching his favorite movies and talking about his screenplays. I liked sitting in his kitchen and looking at his bookshelves and drinking his coffee. I even liked the stupid dance he did when he made the eggs.

Boundaries can get really blurry when you have a friendship like that, but the facts on the ground seemed simple enough. I knew that I liked him, that he liked me back, and that we both liked peanut butter cookies, and as stupid as it sounds that somehow added up to this sort of dream logic that made me feel sure our friendship would be absolutely fine no matter what. I held up the memory of that cookie like a talisman as the signs became increasingly clear that we needed to make a change, one way or the other, and that we had different ideas about what that change should be.

Turns out while half a cookie can work miracles in the confines of a cubicle, it’s no match for whatever chemical reaction must occur when a boy tries to teach you to play his ukulele. And half of ALL the cookies couldn’t even touch how bad I felt the night we went out to celebrate D’s birthday—after we went to the movies, after I’d taken him to my favorite place to eat oysters, after we ducked into the first dive down the block because it was raining so hard—when he folded his hands and told me he wanted to have a “serious talk.”

It pains me to admit that I did not comport myself in the calm cool manner befitting a self-proclaimed paragon of modern values having a serious talk with her good friend and paramour on the night of his birthday celebration. “You’re right,” my idea of me might have said. “The degree to which I enjoy your stupid egg-making dance is troubling, to be sure.” Instead, I got so upset that he had to take me home, where about a year’s worth of dippy friends-forever dream logic devolved into a waking nightmare of ugly psycho tears and bitter accusations.

When the worst of that had passed, D, who has somehow remained Kate Bolick-style besties with every ex and friend with benefits he’s ever had, held my hand and patiently explained how the next phase would work. Soon we’ll get dinner and check in with each other, he said. The difficult part is always the end of the night. It’s going to be awkward at first. It’s going to be hard.

His honesty was always something I admired and aspired to.

Okay, I said. We’ll get dinner. I gripped his hand and felt very bleak, but also very brave and mature.

And something else. After he left, I threw up for two days.

Thus began our new life together as friends without benefits. You could say it set the tone.

R told me I have plenty of friends. She told me about something called the benefit-to-burden ratio, a formula she uses to evaluate potential treatments for hospice patients. She said sometimes the benefit isn’t worth the burden. Sometimes you let it die.

Medical professionals don’t understand the world in terms of cookies, I gather, so it was hard to know where to begin.


Slide 1: You see, the cookie is a symbol, sort of like those friendship necklaces.


Slide 2: Peanut butters are my favorite!


Slide 3: In conclusion, the benefit of being special cookie friends far outweighs the burden of conducting the special cookie friendship in an ash-covered hellscape.

I want us to stay close, he wrote in an email around Christmas. Let’s go to brunch. Let’s go the movies.

I told him I wanted those things, too. (I did. I do.) I love brunch. I love movies. And I suppose I love him (not like that), though that’s not really a word I use with my friends unless I’m signing a card acknowledging some milestone occasion. 

I thought that love would be enough to fuel the transition. That my desire to talk about all the other stuff that makes a life would trump the one terrible moment in time that was our serious talk. That I could sign on for something so benign as a brunch and be like, hey, did your cousin have his bastard child yet?

And yet, for the last nine months, I have found myself utterly unable to do so. Far from having embarked on a new era of super coolness, it turns out I’m more worried and weird than ever. The very thought of having brunch with him fills me with Victorian-grade melancholy and dread, the kind that makes me want to go lie down. The kind that did, in fact, make me lie down for the better part of, oh, two months.

It’s a grim enterprise, trying to reason with your own dread. It really detracts from the perverse satisfaction you can find in feeling sad. 

I have tried to explain to myself in all earnestness that change is a part of life that is inevitable—essential, even—and that to fear it is not only futile, but is also sort of missing the whole point.

Shut up, my dread said. Seriously, ugh.

When it became clear I couldn’t talk myself out of my dread, I decided I would rise above it. Indeed, I would renounce it! I SHALL EAT THE BRUNCH. I said this to myself in a booming Gandalf voice to make it clear I meant business.

But that didn’t work either. So finally I was like, okay. The prospect of exchanging the occasional newsletter-style email with this person for the rest of my life fills me with even more dread than the prospect of a nightmare brunch. The window is closing. Buck up.

They have already started, those emails. They have already stopped. Presumably, his cousin’s bastard has long since been born.

Who knows? D could have his own bastard by now.

I want to take everyone I’ve ever kissed off the backs of their milk cartons and cast them as characters in my upbeat soap opera. I want to join my single-lady sisters in the Promised Land, where we all shop for wedding suits with our former lovers. I want to wear a pretty dress and drink champagne and write about my paramours for The Atlantic. We can all get together and laugh over steaks or something. We can go to yoga and meditate side by side, totally comfortable and serene in the way that only old friends can be, without any of us ever emitting a single psychic death ray.

Staying friends, yeah, I like the idea. But what I think never seems to count for much in these situations. There is only what I feel. Only the airless depths of my stupid inscrutable heart. Only the lingering wish that I could have handled it better.

A few months before our serious talk, D’s car was stolen. One afternoon he went out to run an errand and it wasn’t where he had parked it.

It took five minutes for the police to take the report over the phone, and that was that—no fanfare.

It’s weird, he told me, when something you take for granted disappears. One day it’s just gone, like it never existed.

Yeah, I said. So weird.

03 August 2012

the legend of zelda

Tonight it finally dawned on me that the only thing I’ve ever really liked about the Batman film franchise is the Joker. These days Jack Nicholson’s Joker feels very Zombie Pee-Wee Herman meets Delta Burke, but when I was a kid his whole thing seemed balls out. Iconic, even! Then Ledger went all Tom Waits meets the Technicolor Juggalos, and I was like...oh god, do I believe in Acting now?
  
Anyway, I still haven’t seen Batman 3, but my understanding is that it benefits from fresh viewing of Batman 1. Which, as it turns out, I had almost fully forgotten, and rightfully so. Liam Neeson—well, huh, I totally forgot he was in there. Ken Watanabe? Wait, what? 140 minutes later, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, and (my imaginary life mascot) Michael Caine notwithstanding, I was thoroughly unimpressed.

I was especially unimpressed with the screenwriting, which is not usually something I notice much. (Though, looking back, it looks like I was thoroughly impressed with it in Batman 2.) Apart from the trailer-ready soundbites, which I will grant in deference to how much Batmobiles cost and my great goodwill towards Christopher Nolan, the dialogue was just beyond super clunky. If Christian Bale truly must explain how Batman is a “symbol,” surely he could have found a better audience than Michael Fucking Caine. Save your symbol talk for Katie Holmes, son. People with British accents know about that stuff.

But what truly bugged me was how Bruce Wayne walked into an endless series of weird staged scenarios as though he were living in the Nintendo game Zelda. It first dawned on me during his scene with Tom Wilkinson. Bruce Wayne just waltzed into some bar to listen to this guy’s totally canned monologue, and it was like no one in the room even existed until he arrived. 


I consider myself a moderately self-aware person, and even I am out there walking through the world like Tyra Banks just as a default. So I reckon the last thing that America needs is another blockbuster movie modeling this magical solipsism where characters exist purely just to tell one single person some stuff.

The whole thing was so formulaic that it reminded me of the bits & pieces I have watched of Law & Order, which I just can’t get into (not for lack of trying). Back in my youth, when I cared more, I’d read The Economist whenever I was plagued by insomnia. I never got very far because that magazine can put me to sleep in five minutes flat. These days I just watch Law & Order because it’s like my body physically shuts down when confronted by so many levels of lameness. A. tells me there’s a new Law & Order UK with barristers wearing George Washington wigs. I’m not going to lie, I think that sounds really good.